The deadline by a federal judge last week to explain why she shouldn't hold phil was X contempt of court violated almost a nationwide ban on day, algy David free Internet TV company basically run "oh." Call looming contempt "significantly remedy," phil on X said Monday that it's just a mistake, it is from the fox broadcasting rights programming, ABC and NBC in the Boston area play DC based on judge rosemary elder brother of the order after unplug everywhere, but in New York on September 5, Connecticut and vermont. "In the worst case, phil test the software of X inadvertently allows the user to limit tour copyright programming in the first time for a short time after the Hearst decided. Find this mistake happens, phil X immediately volunteered to take corrective measures before, pay attention to this problem, the plaintiff brings the court said," on page 15 response submitted to the company (read here). , phil was X on October 10, the court, trim the ban, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New Hampshire and Maine state does not include the ruling by September. They cited by Hearst endowment ABC members refused to the same day to Aereo in Massachusetts law to seek an injunction. Five days after the elder brother has said "no", slightly raised the issue of defiance. On Monday for the record, and phil X may not just go and wrong defense is put forward on September 5 star elder brother has to "reasonable may be interpreted as not prohibited phil X from the first circuit court where the possibility of a Aereo, companies operating performance of roughly the same service will not make public, the performance is private." So tell the judge that she is in her explanation, the ban on her order is wrong? It may be easy to come over.
没有评论:
发表评论