Media Companies Ask Supreme Court to Rule on Legality of Aereo

wholesale Philipp Plein

America's largest media company asked the United States Supreme Court ruled Aereo company, the company's online audience with radio signals, it is illegal to operate.
Walt Disney company (DIS), 21 century fox, comcast (CMCSA) NBCUniversal, univision communications company, the Columbia broadcasting company (CBS), public broadcasting service station WNET, New York Tribune - information and station WPIX petition filed book today, the court in the lower court's action did not stop Aereo.
Aereo, supported by Barry diller, threat to the cost of $300 million, radio station will receive this year from pay-tv system to provide the signal to the user. Aereo using thousands of small antenna, capture the free air signal, and send those paying users on the Internet. If permitted, pay-tv systems can provide their own work, in order to avoid paying the so-called money.
Fox spokesman Dan berger, said in an e-mailed statement. "today's record emphasized we see justice determination,". "Without a doubt, Aereo steal our broadcast signals."
Lin Aereo, based in New York, Virginia, a spokeswoman said in an E-mail today, the company may petition to the Supreme Court "at an appropriate time to respond."
Fox chase Carey, the headquarters is located in New York, President and chief operating officer, said earlier this year, the company will convert the fox television network, cable, if the court allows Aereo continue taking signal, without compensation, to stop broadcasting. Leslie's pro, chief executive officer of the Columbia broadcasting company (CBS), haim sarbanes-oxley, scene technology chairman said leisurely, if necessary, they will follow the fox went off the air.
distributor
Radio will collect $3.02 billion from the pay-tv system, the cost doubled to $6.05 billion this year, to 2018, according to bloomberg industry estimates.
In Boston and New York federal judge has approved the Aereo operation in legal challenges. Nathaniel Gorton, the judge wrote that the Boston area earlier this week, the plaintiff has no "shows the advantages of enough success, also does not have the necessary irreparable damage", to prove the possibility of the injunction.
, WNET v. Aereo company in New York, America broadcast discontent v Aereo 12 - CV - 01540, 12 - CV - 01540, Aereo Co. v. CBS 13 - CV - 03013, the United States district court, southern district of New York (Manhattan). In Boston is hirst stand company v. Aereo 13 - CV - 11649, the United States district court, Massachusetts (Boston).

Burberry men Shorts